Universal Bound on the Eigenvalues of 2-Positive Trace-Preserving Maps

The paper proves tr(Φ) ≤ d·min Re σ(Φ) + (d^2−d) for every 2-positive, trace-preserving Φ via a three-step argument built on a transition-matrix lemma (Lemma 1), a real-eigenvalue reduction, a self-adjointization using the ω-adjoint Φ# tied to a full-rank fixed point, and a depolarizing regularization; all steps are explicit and coherent in the uploaded PDF (see the theorem statement and setup, the transition-matrix lemma and its proof, Step 1, the ω-adjoint construction and Bendixson–Hirsch comparison, and the closure/density step respectively ). The candidate solution mirrors the paper’s strategy but replaces the paper’s ω-adjoint (defined using the two-sided ω−1/2 weighting) with a ρ-adjoint defined via the one-sided inner product ⟨X,Y⟩ρ = tr(ρ X†Y), then asserts—without justification—that 2-positivity and trace preservation are preserved under this ρ-adjoint. This is the critical gap: the preservation of 2-positivity (and trace preservation) used to apply the transition-matrix bound to Θ = (Φ + Φ#)/2 in Step 2 relies on the specific ω-adjoint construction in the paper, not on the one-sided ρ-adjoint the model uses. Hence the model’s Step 2 does not go through as stated, even though the rest (Step 0/1/3) aligns in spirit with the paper.